Filma25 !full! May 2026

We conclude that Filma25 is not a prediction but a provocation . It maps a plausible trajectory from today’s AI-assisted editing (e.g., Adobe Firefly video) and crypto-funded indie films (e.g., “The Milk of Dreams,” 2024) toward a fully generative, decentralized, and dynamic cinema. Scholars and practitioners would do well to engage with its implications before the paradigm arrives unbidden. Brooks, T., Holynski, A., & Efros, A. A. (2024). Video generation models as world simulators. OpenAI Technical Report .

Denson, S., & Leyda, J. (Eds.). (2016). Post-cinema: Theorizing 21st-century film . Reframe Books. filma25

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command . Bloomsbury. We conclude that Filma25 is not a prediction

Shaviro, S. (2016). Post-cinematic affect. In S. Denson & J. Leyda (Eds.), Post-cinema (pp. 289–308). Reframe Books. : This paper is a conceptual synthesis. No empirical data was collected. The term “Filma25” is used here as a theoretical construct; any resemblance to an existing trademark or product is coincidental. Brooks, T

Casetti, F. (2021). The relocation of cinema. In S. Denson & J. Leyda (Eds.), Post-cinema: Theorizing 21st-century film (pp. 42–59). Reframe Books.

Renz, M. (2023). Film3: Blockchain-based decentralized film production. Journal of Media Economics , 36(1), 22–41.