__full__: Tideman Algorithm

Its deep insight is that — a landslide should outweigh a squeaker in resolving circular ties, but never override a direct pairwise majority. This balance between strength and directness makes Tideman one of the most intellectually satisfying voting algorithms ever devised.

But there is a more insidious problem: (e.g., A > B, B > C, C > A). Here, no single candidate beats all others head-to-head. The question is: How do we break the cycle fairly? tideman algorithm

(strength of victory): [ \textmargin(a, b) = P[a][b] - P[b][a] ] If ( \textmargin(a, b) > 0 ), then ( a ) beats ( b ). Its deep insight is that — a landslide

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.