So buy the beautiful dress. Just buy it with eyes wide open. And for heaven’s sake, wear it more than once. Have you ever made a frivolous dress purchase? What’s your personal “line” between a treat and a mistake? Let me know in the comments.
Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Section 523(a)(2)(C) creates a presumption of fraud for any “luxury goods” or services totaling more than $725 (adjusted for inflation) bought on a credit card within 90 days of filing for bankruptcy. While the law doesn’t define “luxury goods,” legal precedent consistently points back to that 1887 case. A winter coat? Necessary. A set of designer stilettos? Potentially frivolous. A bespoke suit for a job interview? Necessary. A velvet smoking jacket for lounging? Frivolous. frivolous dress order
In high-net-worth divorces, one spouse (usually the husband, historically) might object to the other’s clothing expenditures. A judge will ask: Was that $5,000 handbag a reasonable, necessary expense for maintaining the marital standard of living, or was it a frivolous dissipation of assets? So buy the beautiful dress
If you buy a couture gown the week after filing for separation, you might have to reimburse the marital estate for it. We cannot discuss this term without acknowledging its sharp, gendered edge. There is no historical equivalent for a “frivolous watch order” or a “frivolous golf club order.” The term emerged in a era when women’s spending was seen as inherently suspect, their desires dismissed as vain and foolish. Have you ever made a frivolous dress purchase