This doggishness extends beyond technology into our political and social lives. The archetype of the citizen has been supplanted by the archetype of the loyal pet. We no longer seek leaders who challenge us, who demand we be better, more thoughtful wolves. Instead, we crave masters who will reassure us, who will scratch us behind the ears and tell us we are good. Partisanship has become less about ideology and more about pack loyalty. To bark at the strange dog on the other side of the fence is not an act of discernment, but of reflexive tribal affiliation. We have forgotten how to growl thoughtfully; we only know how to yap in unison.
To reject doggishness, then, is to reclaim the dignity of the working dog over the pathetic image of the lapdog. It is to ask of ourselves: Are we acting out of conditioned obedience, or reasoned choice? Are we seeking the comfort of the kennel, or the responsibility of the watch? Are we waiting to be fed, or are we learning to hunt for truth? current doggishness
Yet, to diagnose this condition is not to call for a return to savagery. The wolf is not a moral ideal; it is a starving metaphor. The answer to doggishness is not feral anarchy. Rather, it is a call for a more conscious domestication. The dog at its best is not merely obedient; it is a partner. A sheepdog works with the shepherd, not for the shepherd. A rescue dog searches for the lost not out of fear of punishment, but out of a shared purpose. Instead, we crave masters who will reassure us,